Parental and family involvement
in schools is needed for a nurturing, affective, positive learning atmosphere.
Without parental support, whether it is with after-school events or in-class
academics, the full potential of a school in not realized. School boards and
state policies can have an impact as to what and how local schools involve
parents and the community.
The Saint Paul Public
School District in Middletown, Conn., realized this need when it adopted its
Family Involvement Policy in 2006. The policy’s purpose was made clear by its
premise statement, “The Board believes that the involvement of families in the
children’s educations every year…has positive impact on the student’s success
in school.”
This revised policy
directly references the six pillars of parental involvement while also adding
three bullets as to the goals of the policy. The Family Involvement Policy
requires each school to plan, strategize and organize ways to better involve
and activate parents within the school concerning specific elements: parenting,
communication, volunteering, learning at home, decision making and community
collaboration. The goal of this policy is to increase participation and
opportunities for parental involvement within the school and recognize that the
school, students and parents share the responsibility for each child’s
education.
The Board understands
that a supportive home environment is vital for student success; varied and
persistent communication is key to make the home-school connection work; active
parental support through volunteering improves the environment around the
school; connecting what is being taught in the classroom to the home will help
parents and teachers educate students; all parties benefit when parents take an
active role in decisions in and around the school and that schools and families
are part of a larger community. When schools, families and communities work
together, they strengthen student achievement and the school’s role in the
community structure.
This policy’s positive
attribute is that it requires each school to make its own, unique plan under
general, sweeping paradigms. It is not a heavy-handed, top-down edict, but a
comprehensive, building-level approach. The school board does not tell each
school how they will involve parents in volunteering or how schools and
teachers are to communicate with the community. It simply requires the school
to have a plan with the goal of increasing opportunities of parental
participation.
Each school within a
school district is unique. Some districts, like Little Rock, may be a mix of
neighborhood-centered elementary schools and magnet schools that have a
wide-arrangement of students from different communities both inside and outside
the city limits. This policy recognizes that a one-size fits all approach may
not be best for all schools at all grade levels.
The challenge of this
policy is to whom do they submit such a plan and who is to oversee that each
school is following the guidelines set by the Board. Also, who in the school is
responsible for producing such a document and under what umbrella of research
are they to base their strategies? While these questions do linger, ultimately,
it is the individual schools responsibility, and by association, the
principal’s duty to decide what is the best approach for their school.
Overall, this is a
satisfactory policy. As stated earlier, it is not heavy handed, but it creates
clear areas of focus, primarily the six types of parental involvement. Its
simple goal of increasing participation and opportunities within the school is
a positive first step toward improving parental involvement. It is a
comprehensive approach that allows each individual PreK-12 school to enact
building-level policies that best suit the unique nature of that school. It
recognizes a neighborhood-based elementary school has opportunities and
challenges that a large, sprawling high school may not share.
No comments:
Post a Comment